|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Saturday, September 7, 2013
2013 UWFFL Week 1 - "Patches Optional, Fun Mandatory"
Thursday, September 5, 2013
Removal Of Sponsor Patches May Lead To Increased Ticket Prices
reprinted from The Seattle Post-Dispatch, Thursday, September 5, 2013
SEATTLE - A source speaking on the condition on anonymity admitted Wednesday that the Seattle Superbeasts may choose to raise single game ticket prices to make up for a shortfall in revenue that would occur if they do not wear sponsor patches in all fourteen regular season games.
On Monday the UWFFL announced that a competitive disadvantage may occur if one team wearing a sponsor patch is playing another team not wearing a sponsor patch. The Atlanta Flying Fleet, for instance, won their first two preseason games while not wearing sponsor patches, yet they added their Comfort Suites sponsor patches for their August 25 game against Birmingham and lost 64-40.
In the UWFFL, games are decided by fan vote. If fans are specifically voting against teams just because of the presence of a sponsor patch, then it would lead to an unfair situation whenever one team with a sponsor patch is playing another team without.
Since wearing a sponsor patch may therefore hinder a team's performance, both on the field and in the polls, the league decided to make the wearing of the patches optional, and if a team with a title sponsor was playing a team without one, the team with a sponsor would have the option of not wearing their patches in those games.
After meeting with their corporate partners, who in some cases have put up millions of dollars to have their image and products adorn the UWFFL teams' uniforms, they agreed that if sponsorship advertising was not worn by some teams in some games, the league would have to rebate some of the sponsorship fees that the advertising was going to generate.
In the case of the Superbeasts, that means a possible shortfall in revenue.
"All I can tell you," the source stated off the record, "is that when we were approached by the league with the sponsorship program guidelines, including the increased revenue that the program would generate, we adjusted our projected profit margins accordingly. Now with the modifications to the program, that revenue does not meet those projections. The team's Board of Governors, however, approved an operating budget and expenditure plan for the 2013-14 fiscal year based on those projections. The shortfall would have to be made up somewhere, and after a careful analysis of our whole operation, the simplest and easiest solution is to raise ticket prices."
"Since season ticket holders are already locked in at their fee structure, the difference would be applied just to single game purchases. We decided the the fairest thing to do was to just apply the rate increase to games in which the team will not be wearing the sponsor patches. Therefore for games in which the Superbeasts are not wearing their sponsorship patches, we will see an increase in single game ticket prices of between $8-$30 per ticket."
"We would love to keep the sponsorship patches on for all games, however we are also committed to putting the most competitive product on the field that we can. When you tell me that we may lose a game because we are wearing a sponsor patch when our opponent isn't, then it's an easy call for me -- we lose the patches. Unfortunately what comes with that is a decrease in revenue, which has to be made up somewhere."
"I think if you ask real, true Superbeasts fans about that, they want to win, if it costs them an extra eight to thirty dollars a game, then 'so be it,' they'll say. These fans deserve a championship, and we want to bring it to them. In fact some of these fans, a few I spoke with today, I feel they are proud to do their part in helping the team. They feel like by paying an extra $20 or so, if it helps make the team a winner, then they feel like they are doing their part."
"If you want to blame anybody, blame the liberal voters who are opposed to sponsorship patches and vote teams down for wearing them. These people vote on these games with an agenda, and that agenda is to removes the ad patches from the game, they don't want them in the game. When they vote like that, in these kind of numbers, it affects the outcome of games, I think the league had no choice. It is a shame that something as innocuous as a patch on a football uniform has to be politicized and made a pawn in this greater debate."
"It is truly a shame, that because of this agenda, these regular joe working class Americans now have to shell out more dollars to see a football game. It's just sad."
Calls to the Superbeasts' PR department and general manager's office, as well as league officials, were not returned.
The initial UWFFL plan regarding team sponsorhips indicated that all teams would wear sponsor patches in all games, however some team owners balked at that.
Said Jeff ("The") Provo, owner of the Minnesota Mustangs on July 7, "Discord will rule Equestria before the Mustangs put a (darn) ad on their jerseys." Shortly thereafter the league decided to make having sponsorship (and patches) optional.
SEATTLE - A source speaking on the condition on anonymity admitted Wednesday that the Seattle Superbeasts may choose to raise single game ticket prices to make up for a shortfall in revenue that would occur if they do not wear sponsor patches in all fourteen regular season games.
On Monday the UWFFL announced that a competitive disadvantage may occur if one team wearing a sponsor patch is playing another team not wearing a sponsor patch. The Atlanta Flying Fleet, for instance, won their first two preseason games while not wearing sponsor patches, yet they added their Comfort Suites sponsor patches for their August 25 game against Birmingham and lost 64-40.
In the UWFFL, games are decided by fan vote. If fans are specifically voting against teams just because of the presence of a sponsor patch, then it would lead to an unfair situation whenever one team with a sponsor patch is playing another team without.
Since wearing a sponsor patch may therefore hinder a team's performance, both on the field and in the polls, the league decided to make the wearing of the patches optional, and if a team with a title sponsor was playing a team without one, the team with a sponsor would have the option of not wearing their patches in those games.
After meeting with their corporate partners, who in some cases have put up millions of dollars to have their image and products adorn the UWFFL teams' uniforms, they agreed that if sponsorship advertising was not worn by some teams in some games, the league would have to rebate some of the sponsorship fees that the advertising was going to generate.
In the case of the Superbeasts, that means a possible shortfall in revenue.
"All I can tell you," the source stated off the record, "is that when we were approached by the league with the sponsorship program guidelines, including the increased revenue that the program would generate, we adjusted our projected profit margins accordingly. Now with the modifications to the program, that revenue does not meet those projections. The team's Board of Governors, however, approved an operating budget and expenditure plan for the 2013-14 fiscal year based on those projections. The shortfall would have to be made up somewhere, and after a careful analysis of our whole operation, the simplest and easiest solution is to raise ticket prices."
"Since season ticket holders are already locked in at their fee structure, the difference would be applied just to single game purchases. We decided the the fairest thing to do was to just apply the rate increase to games in which the team will not be wearing the sponsor patches. Therefore for games in which the Superbeasts are not wearing their sponsorship patches, we will see an increase in single game ticket prices of between $8-$30 per ticket."
"We would love to keep the sponsorship patches on for all games, however we are also committed to putting the most competitive product on the field that we can. When you tell me that we may lose a game because we are wearing a sponsor patch when our opponent isn't, then it's an easy call for me -- we lose the patches. Unfortunately what comes with that is a decrease in revenue, which has to be made up somewhere."
"I think if you ask real, true Superbeasts fans about that, they want to win, if it costs them an extra eight to thirty dollars a game, then 'so be it,' they'll say. These fans deserve a championship, and we want to bring it to them. In fact some of these fans, a few I spoke with today, I feel they are proud to do their part in helping the team. They feel like by paying an extra $20 or so, if it helps make the team a winner, then they feel like they are doing their part."
"If you want to blame anybody, blame the liberal voters who are opposed to sponsorship patches and vote teams down for wearing them. These people vote on these games with an agenda, and that agenda is to removes the ad patches from the game, they don't want them in the game. When they vote like that, in these kind of numbers, it affects the outcome of games, I think the league had no choice. It is a shame that something as innocuous as a patch on a football uniform has to be politicized and made a pawn in this greater debate."
"It is truly a shame, that because of this agenda, these regular joe working class Americans now have to shell out more dollars to see a football game. It's just sad."
Calls to the Superbeasts' PR department and general manager's office, as well as league officials, were not returned.
The initial UWFFL plan regarding team sponsorhips indicated that all teams would wear sponsor patches in all games, however some team owners balked at that.
Said Jeff ("The") Provo, owner of the Minnesota Mustangs on July 7, "Discord will rule Equestria before the Mustangs put a (darn) ad on their jerseys." Shortly thereafter the league decided to make having sponsorship (and patches) optional.
Giraffes To Honor Wounded Warriors With Special Uniforms
For their Sept. 8th game against the Washington Huskers, the Roanoke
Giraffes release their "Girafflage" unis. Jenna Marquis, one of the
Giraffes' PR reps, says, "The uniforms are combining the natural camo of
the Giraffe with the Woodland's color palette previously worn by the US
Military. Since we will be focusing on troops past and present with
this uniform, we will auction off the jerseys and helmets after the game
to raise funds for the Wounded Warriors Foundation."
When Coach McManus was asked about the uniforms he replied, "I don't normally like changing from our standard uniforms on gameday. They represent Roanoke, the Giraffe herd, and our team. They did keep my suggestion to use the spotted pattern and we'll look good on the field. I hope we can raise enough money from the auction to help a few families in the area."
When Coach McManus was asked about the uniforms he replied, "I don't normally like changing from our standard uniforms on gameday. They represent Roanoke, the Giraffe herd, and our team. They did keep my suggestion to use the spotted pattern and we'll look good on the field. I hope we can raise enough money from the auction to help a few families in the area."
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Atlanta GM Blames Loss On Advertising Patches
reprinted from The Atlanta Vindicator, Tuesday, August 27, 2013
ATLANTA - Atlanta Flying Fleet GM Mickey Lollis blamed his team's preseason loss to the minor league Birmingham Vulcans this weekend on the presence of advertising patches.
"I don't want to take away anything from what (the Vulcans) did on the field, but when you see the outcome, the two teams that were matched up. I think what happened was obvious. Yes, it was because of the patches. It had to be."
The Fleet lost to the Vulcans 64-40 in their first game wearing the sponsorship patches of the Comfort Suites, a nationwide hotel chain that is affiliated with Choice Hotels, Inc.
The Fleet had been 2-0 and had won their first two preseason games, not wearing any advertising patches, by the scores of 645-492 and 285-256. Their win in the UWFFL Preseason opener on August 4 against the San Francisco Reign Fire set multiple league records for votes received.
"You're gonna tell me that a team gets almost 650 votes without a patch and then only gets 40 votes when wearing a patch is just a coincidence? I was born in the dark, but not last night."
"I don't think it says anything about Comfort Suites. I've always had a great time every time I've ever stayed in one of their hotels. Friendly people. Nice mattresses. Always a good night's sleep. The staff is always wonderful."
"If I have anything to say about the Comfort Suites that is not complimentary, it would be, and it's not their fault, but the occasional jackass that I'm usually behind when I'm checking in. It's always the same kind of guy -- he had a request because he wanted to be on a particular floor, and they didn't have it. This one guy the other night -- he complained that the luggage carts wheels were low on air. Can you believe that!? The luggage cart! Who complains about that?!"
"What a jackass."
ATLANTA - Atlanta Flying Fleet GM Mickey Lollis blamed his team's preseason loss to the minor league Birmingham Vulcans this weekend on the presence of advertising patches.
"I don't want to take away anything from what (the Vulcans) did on the field, but when you see the outcome, the two teams that were matched up. I think what happened was obvious. Yes, it was because of the patches. It had to be."
The Fleet lost to the Vulcans 64-40 in their first game wearing the sponsorship patches of the Comfort Suites, a nationwide hotel chain that is affiliated with Choice Hotels, Inc.
The Fleet had been 2-0 and had won their first two preseason games, not wearing any advertising patches, by the scores of 645-492 and 285-256. Their win in the UWFFL Preseason opener on August 4 against the San Francisco Reign Fire set multiple league records for votes received.
"You're gonna tell me that a team gets almost 650 votes without a patch and then only gets 40 votes when wearing a patch is just a coincidence? I was born in the dark, but not last night."
"I don't think it says anything about Comfort Suites. I've always had a great time every time I've ever stayed in one of their hotels. Friendly people. Nice mattresses. Always a good night's sleep. The staff is always wonderful."
"If I have anything to say about the Comfort Suites that is not complimentary, it would be, and it's not their fault, but the occasional jackass that I'm usually behind when I'm checking in. It's always the same kind of guy -- he had a request because he wanted to be on a particular floor, and they didn't have it. This one guy the other night -- he complained that the luggage carts wheels were low on air. Can you believe that!? The luggage cart! Who complains about that?!"
"What a jackass."
Monday, December 29, 2003
Miami wins TBFFL Bowl IV 72-65
Victory over Seattle gives Cougars back-to-back titles; Superbeasts 0-3 in the big game
QB Marc Bulger, who became the first person to start for both teams in one TBFFL game, was injured in the Rams' 30-20 loss to Detroit Sunday and his status for the Rams' first playoff game, which will be January 10 or 11, is uncertain. He scored 10 points, with 170 yards passing and 1 TD and 1 INT, before being replaced by Kurt Warner in the fourth quarter.
Holmes rushed for only 50 yards, but had two touchdowns in the Chiefs' 31-3 victory over the Bears Sunday.
Tuesday, December 23, 2003
Miami wins 2nd GFC Title; 106-76 over Reapers
Seattle defeats Terror 100-58, reaches 3rd TBFFL Bowl
Seattle wrapped up a victory in the SFC Championship Game over Tampa, as LaDanian Tomlinson scored 2 TDs en route to a 21 point performance, and Seattle breezed to a 100-48 lead going into Monday. Ryan Longwell added 10 points Monday Night, but it wasn't enough, as Seattle (15-2) advanced to their third TBFFL Bowl. They lost TBFFL Bowl II to the Connecticut Convicts and in 2000, they lost the inaguaral TBFFL Bowl to the Texas Timberwolves. This year's SFC Championship game avenges last year's SFC title game, in which Tampa defeated Seattle 103-91. The Terror (12-5) were led by 28 points by Priest Holmes.
The Cougars, winners of last year's TBFFL Bowl over Tampa, and the Superbeasts, have the best two records in the TBFFL over the past two seasons. Since the beginning of the 2002 season, Seattle is a league-best 29-5, with two division titles, and Miami is a second-best 27-7-1, with only one divisional title, however they do have a TBFFL championship, while Seattle, which is 51-17 over their four years in the TBFFL, is still looking for it's first.
Marc Bulger quarterbacks both Seattle and Miami, in the inter-conference championship game. Last year Priest Holmes was on both Tampa and Miami's rosters, however he was held out of the Week 17 TBFFL Bowl because he did not play in Kansas City's final game last year with an injury.
Sunday, December 17, 2000
49ers lead way to an All-Ron TBFFL Bowl
In the other semi-final, Texas (10-6) clicnhed the victory over the Atlanta Flying Fleet, leading 48-40 Sunday. Atlanta (11-5) held a 25-8 lead after the 1:00 games with the "Purple Attack" of the Baltimore Ravens, Trent Dilfer, Jamal Lewis and Qadry Ismail set to "open it up" on the Arizona Cardinals. Lewis ran for a touchdown and 126 yards as Baltimore beat Arizona 13-7, but Dilfer and Ismail combined for just 1 point, which opened the door for Texas to get to TBFFL Bowl I, as Jeff Garcia threw for over 400 yards, and 27 points.
Rob, who benched Kurt Warner, Cris Carter, Tim Brown and Al Del Greco to try to shake things up, was disappointed Sunday Evening. "Well, I gambled and I lost. Cris Carter had a touchdown. Ahman Green had a big game. And the Ravens didn't do anything. I figured they'd beat the Cardinals 48-0. I just hope Warner doesn't have a big game tommorrow night. Trent Dilfer! Hah!"
Tuesday, November 28, 2000
Holiday Holds On, Atlanta & Detroit Win
Packers' D comes up 5 points short for Outlaws, but Dallas still alive
Monday night's Packers-Pathers game (or Pack-Cats if you were watching ABC's telecast) wasn’t as dramatic as three weeks ago when Antonio Freeman's juggling overtime catch defeated Minnesota, but don't tell that to the TBFFL fans watching.
Brett Favre and Ryan Longwell for Phoenix as well as Steve Beuerlein for Texas both failed to score enough points for their teams to overtake Atlanta and Detroit. The Flying Fleet and the Demons, (both 9-4) can both still win the Western Division title. The Circles and the T-Wolves, both 7-6 and assured of being in the playoffs, will meet in the season finale next week. Both teams are a game behind the 8-5 Seattle Superbeasts, who play Holiday. All three teams still have a chance of winning the Central Division title. Seattle controls their own destiny and would take the division with a win, but if they lose, they would be in a tiebreaker with the winner of the Phoenix-Texas game. If it is Phoenix, Phoenix would have the advantage, they would have a 4-2 division record, compared with Seattle's 3-3. If Seattle and Texas wind up tied, it would be decided by point differential in divisional games. Going into Week 14, Seattle leads Texas +9 to +2. If they were to end up tied after this weeks games' the tiebreaker would go to Texas based on net points overall.
But the important matchup decided last night was between 5-7 Holiday and 5-7 Dallas. Both teams desperately needed a win if they wanted to qualify for the playoffs. The Vikings held a 9 point lead, with Green Bay special teams yet to play for the Outlaws. They were only able to score 4 points on 2 sacks, 1 interception and 1 fumble recovery, but Dallas remained alive, albeit remotely, to get in the playoffs next week, they would need to beat Atlanta, and have both Miami and Tampa lose. Miami, who has continued to struggle since losing Terrell Davis and Brian Griese, and Holiday can both clinch the final two playoff spots with wins this week. Tampa, like Dallas, needs some help to make the playoffs. If either Holiday or Miami lose, the Terror would get in with a win.
The two teams of these four that fail to make the playoffs will compete with Chicago and Jacksonville for the right (not) to meet in the Toilet Bowl, Dec. 18.
Good luck, everybody!
Monday, November 27, 2000
Seattle in Playoffs, Phoenix and T-Wolves back their way in; Dallas-Holiday battle to be decided tonight
Atlanta and Detroit keep pace a top the Western Division, both winning big
The Seattle Superbeasts (8-5) have apparently completed their trek from last place to the playoffs by winning their fifth straight game, and clinching a playoff spot, defeating the Tampa Terror (5-7-1), whose own playoff hopes are seriously in doubt after losing their third straight. The S-Beasts lead 78 to 75 with only Green Bay's Bubba Franks playing tonight for Seattle. The Tampa loss also puts Phoenix (7-5) and Texas (7-5) into the playoffs, even though they both are losing to Detroit and Atlanta, respectively (both 8-4). The Crop Circles trail the Demons by 32, but Phoenix has both Brett Favre and Ryan Longwell tonight. Texas still has Steve Beurelein QB-ing the Panthers tonight, but they trail Atlanta by 30. A Fleet win and a Demon loss would give the Western Division to Atlanta.
Seattle, who was lead by Donovan McNabb's 25 points, could take the Central Division out-right with a win next week, assuming Favre or Beuerlein don't have a shootout tonight.
In a game with major playoff implications, Dallas (5-7) trails Holiday (also 5-7) by nine points, with the Green Bay defense going for the Outlaws tonight. "My Packer-D is going to come up big tonight, I can feel it," said Dallas Outlaw owner Patrick Bryant Monday Morning. The loser would fall behind the Terror and be in serious danger of missing the playoffs. The winner would be tied at 6-7 with Miami and be in a good position to grab one of the final playoff spots next week.
The Lakers, meanwhile, loss to the Eastern Division Champion Pittsburgh Gators in blowout fashion, as they continue their injuried-plagued slump, dropping their thrid straight. Pittsburgh (9-3-1) has the best record in the league and can wrap up the #1 seed in the playoffs with a win over the Jacksonville Jackals.
Jacksonville (3-10), who had won two in a row after starting 1-9, loss to the Chicago Cyclones (also 3-10) in what could be a preview of the Toilet Bowl. They trail by nine points, with the Cyclones still having Bill Schroeder tonight.
Check back here tommorrow morning for official results and a updated look at the playoff picture.
The Seattle Superbeasts (8-5) have apparently completed their trek from last place to the playoffs by winning their fifth straight game, and clinching a playoff spot, defeating the Tampa Terror (5-7-1), whose own playoff hopes are seriously in doubt after losing their third straight. The S-Beasts lead 78 to 75 with only Green Bay's Bubba Franks playing tonight for Seattle. The Tampa loss also puts Phoenix (7-5) and Texas (7-5) into the playoffs, even though they both are losing to Detroit and Atlanta, respectively (both 8-4). The Crop Circles trail the Demons by 32, but Phoenix has both Brett Favre and Ryan Longwell tonight. Texas still has Steve Beurelein QB-ing the Panthers tonight, but they trail Atlanta by 30. A Fleet win and a Demon loss would give the Western Division to Atlanta.
Seattle, who was lead by Donovan McNabb's 25 points, could take the Central Division out-right with a win next week, assuming Favre or Beuerlein don't have a shootout tonight.
In a game with major playoff implications, Dallas (5-7) trails Holiday (also 5-7) by nine points, with the Green Bay defense going for the Outlaws tonight. "My Packer-D is going to come up big tonight, I can feel it," said Dallas Outlaw owner Patrick Bryant Monday Morning. The loser would fall behind the Terror and be in serious danger of missing the playoffs. The winner would be tied at 6-7 with Miami and be in a good position to grab one of the final playoff spots next week.
The Lakers, meanwhile, loss to the Eastern Division Champion Pittsburgh Gators in blowout fashion, as they continue their injuried-plagued slump, dropping their thrid straight. Pittsburgh (9-3-1) has the best record in the league and can wrap up the #1 seed in the playoffs with a win over the Jacksonville Jackals.
Jacksonville (3-10), who had won two in a row after starting 1-9, loss to the Chicago Cyclones (also 3-10) in what could be a preview of the Toilet Bowl. They trail by nine points, with the Cyclones still having Bill Schroeder tonight.
Check back here tommorrow morning for official results and a updated look at the playoff picture.
Sunday, August 27, 2000
TBFFL Draft Today
Draft Day: Who Will Go #1, Warner or Manning?
The TBFFL draft is only hours away, yet it appears to still be up in the air who will be taken with the number one pick. Rob Holecko, owner of the Atlanta Flying Fleet, is apparently still undecided who to take, although it appears he will definitely take a quarterback.
"I am about 90% sure I'll be taking a quarterback. Whether it's Manning or Warner, now I don't know. Right this minute, I'm leaning toward Kurt Warner, just because I think that if he does his best, he'll have far and away the highest stats this year. However, Manning probably has a lessor downside, that is Warner is probably more of a risk. Of course injuries can hit anybody, and I think we saw that last year."
Last year, with the sixth pick, Rob took Ricky Williams, the rookie Saints running back. While Williams did play for some of the year, it was still a gamble that didn't pay off. "Yes, he was pretty much a bust. But he did get some yards and points, unlike some of the higher picks, Terrell Davis (who went #1 to Detroit) and Jamaal Anderson (#5 Colorado) both went higher and were out for the year. I can assure you I won't be taking Ron Dayne with the first pick," Rob said with a laugh.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


